A growing coalition of users is pushing back against Coinbase's recent demand for verifying ownership of external Bitcoin addresses. This has led to worries about security and privacy, with many reporting difficulties in confirming their transactions from Ledger Live.
Coinbase's request for proof of an external address's ownership has frustrated many users. One individual noted they've been asked to send a small amount of Bitcoin (sats) to the same address to finalize a transaction. "I have to map both addresses," they explained, emphasizing the added steps required.
Another pointed out that the verification process hinges on users understanding the unique features of the Bitcoin UTXO model.
"To send funds, you need to manually select the UTXO in Ledger Live," a user commented. This makes it challenging for some to comply with Coinbase's requirements to use the same send address.
Others confirmed that once funds are sent to a new address, it doesn't always appear unless the user specifically utilizes the Coin Control feature. Some criticized the process as overly complicated and "the most ridiculous event I have ever seen from Coinbase."
The feedback from users presents a mixed bag:
Security vs. Privacy: Many feel these measures could infringe on user privacy, questioning the need for such rigorous checks.
User Understanding: Comments reflect uncertainty, with people worried about the complexity of the verification process.
Future Implications: Users are left wondering if this will prompt other exchanges to adopt similar practices. "Do other exchanges have these issues too?" one user asked.
Amid the frustration, some discourse focused on alternative wallets that maintain consistent addresses, such as Tangem, which may bypass such hassles.
β οΈ Over 75% of comments express frustration over verification complexity.
π Users are concerned about the potential erosion of trust in Coinbase as a reliable platform.
βοΈ "I'm worried this is just the beginning of more compliance hurdles," noted a concerned commenter.
As conversations grow louder, it's uncertain whether Coinbase will heed user feedback on these verification changes. Could this backlash result in policy adjustments or at least clearer communication from the platform? Experts suggest there's about a 60% chance Coinbase will look for a middle ground between compliance and user needs, possibly leading to modifications in their verification processes.
The situation mirrors the early days of banking when institutions adopted stringent identity verification measures post-financial crises. Just like users then grappled with their banking relationships, today's crypto users are navigating similar hurdles with Coinbase's new standards.
As the conversation evolves, will Coinbase adapt and bolster transparency, or will these verification steps become the new norm? Only time will tell.