Trumpβs cryptocurrency has plummeted 87% from its peak value, sparking heated debate. Many are questioning investor loyalty and the validity of the coin's purpose amidst rising skepticism.
Recent comments suggest that the cryptocurrency may not have been intended for traditional investment. One commenter remarked,
"The point of the coin was never to go up. It was to allow people to bribe Trump and his family, and itβs done quite well from that perspective."
This raises alarms about ethical implications in its use, highlighting possible underlying motives.
Concerns over potential hidden fees similar to those tied to Trump NFTs have also surfaced. As one observer pointed out,
"Wonder can Trumpβs shitcoins have the same hidden fees as Trump NFTs?"
A reference to the 10% cut from secondary market sales echoes similar worries about transparency and user exploitation.
The community's reactions remain divided. While some express dark humor and criticize regulatory practices, others assert misguided optimism. A user provocatively claimed,
"I think youβre going to find that $Trump is up 700% in the last 12 months!"
Such contradictory sentiments underline confusion about the coin's real performance.
π© Ethical Concerns: "The coin was to allow people to bribe Trump and his family."
πΈ Transparency Issues: "Can Trumpβs shitcoins have the same hidden fees as Trump NFTs?"
π Confusing Gains: "$Trump is up 700% in the last 12 months!"
With such public skepticism, experts suggest that this downturn could lead to further declinesβpotentially another 60% drop if confidence doesnβt stabilize.
The continuing decline in value seems reminiscent of past financial collapses. Are we observing a mere hiccup, or is this the start of a more profound crisis within the crypto market related to Trumpβs venture?
As sentiments shift, only time will reveal the full scope of this unfolding drama surrounding Trumpβs cryptocurrency.