Home
/
Industry news
/
Innovation in blockchain
/

Top 10 blockchain projects missing due to bridge hack

ONE Token's Journey | From Vision to Controversy

By

Sofia Gonzalez

Aug 16, 2025, 12:38 PM

Edited By

John Tsoi

3 minutes needed to read

A digital representation of a blockchain network being hindered by a security breach, symbolizing lost potential and opportunity in the crypto space.
popular

A growing divide among crypto enthusiasts has emerged as ONE struggles to maintain its position after a notorious security incident. Users are split over the token's potential, with some suggesting it could have been a top contender in the crypto market.

The Rise and Fall of ONE

The blockchain technology behind ONE offers features similar to Solana, such as low fees and rapid transactions. Yet, a significant setback came from a breach that many believe compromised its credibility. The community is polarized; some users see the tech as solid, while others cite continued issues and red flags.

"ONE was solid tech. Circumstances changed." This reflects the sentiment of some supporters, who still see potential in the project's capabilities, despite the setbacks. Meanwhile, critics are less forgiving, stating, "If ONE wasn't a scam, it would be in the top 10."

Security Breach Fallout

After the hack, opinions shifted drastically. Discussions reveal that many users feel the hack derailed ONE's chances at significant growth. Concerns about transaction spam and security risks from earlier development choices continue to haunt the project's reputation.

  • Leadership Issues: The project has been criticized for past leadership decisions, including funding questionable DAOs and mishandling community trust.

  • Tech Viability: Despite its potential, many argue that the underlying technology is not groundbreaking. "Tech is nothing special while anyone could build it," said one user.

  • Current Trading Status: At press time, ONE is trading under $0.02, while many alternative coins have surged.

Community Sentiment

The chat boards are buzzing with mixed feelings. Users posted comments like, "Bro, it’s over. Come to terms." Mixed sentiments reflect a community grappling with lost faith and fading hopes for development on the chain.

Despite the controversy, there’s a glimmer of optimism. Some community members point to PREP trading as ONE's last hope for turning things around, indicating a willingness to fight for the project’s resurgence.

Key Highlights

  • πŸ”₯ Strong skepticism: Many view the project as a scam, impacting its credibility.

  • πŸ“‰ Low market performance: ONE remains under $0.02, raising concerns about future viability.

  • πŸ€” Tech potential: Some believe there’s still value in the technology, if managed correctly.

As this story continues to unfold, ONE's journey serves as a cautionary tale in the ever-changing crypto realm. Will it rise again like the phoenix, or continue to linger in the shadows?

What's Next for ONE Token?

Experts suggest there’s a strong chance ONE may struggle to regain its former standing in the market, with estimates indicating only a 30% probability of making a significant turnaround in the next year. This bleak outlook stems from ongoing skepticism, compounded by leadership issues and a damaged reputation from the recent hack. However, if the team can focus on enhancing security measures and rebuild trust within the community, the probability of a modest recovery could increase to about 50%. Many believe PREP trading could provide short-term relief, but sustained growth requires a comprehensive strategy to address deep-seated concerns and innovate the technology behind ONE.

Historical Echoes

The situation facing ONE Token draws a unique parallel to the early days of the internet in the 1990s. Just like some tech firms at the time suffered from bloodbath bankruptcies due to security breaches and lack of consumer trust, many promising projects faded out before the dot-com bubble burst. Yet, a small number persevered, finding their footing by adapting their technologies and rebuilding their reputations. It serves as a reminder that in the digital frontier, survival often hinges on resilience and the ability to pivot in the face of adversity.