Home
/
Educational resources
/
Crypto basics
/

What to do when your 3 month old baby cries for the first time

Users Voice Frustrations Over Crypto Hardware Failures | Devices Aging Faster than Anticipated

By

David Mbana

Aug 9, 2025, 03:31 AM

Edited By

Anika Patel

Updated

Aug 10, 2025, 03:31 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A 3-month-old baby crying in a crib with a concerned parent leaning nearby
popular

A rising tide of complaints from users about malfunctioning crypto hardware devices is shaking consumer confidence. Many have reported units just three months old failing to power on, raising questions about reliability in this tech-driven field.

Increasing Battery Issues Reported

Comment threads on various forums have become hotbeds for shared frustrations regarding battery-related problems. One user noted, > "Same issue. Troubleshooting didnโ€™t solve it; sent it back to Ledger for a replacement. Received the replacement, turned it on, and had the same issue. Not using Ledger anymore." This highlights a concerning pattern: users are grappling with devices that often require constant attention.

Another user chimed in, mentioning, > "Iโ€™ve never gotten these notices, but mine wonโ€™t work unless itโ€™s plugged in; Iโ€™ve had it for a while now, maybe two years." As these comments illustrate, thereโ€™s a growing sentiment around device dependability.

Common Experiences and Solutions

Many users share similar experiences with device failures. A recurring theme is the need for constant charging:

  • Dependence on Power: Users are confirming that devices fail unless plugged in, with one stating, "It turns off constantly unless I'm plugged in, which is annoying."

  • Alternatives Considered: Users are exploring options like Tangem, signaling a lack of trust in current models.

  • Safety Precautions: With one person revealing plans for a backup strategy, it's clear users are taking extra steps to secure their assets.

User Sentiment and Implications

The sentiment in these discussions ranges from frustration to tentative resignation. Many are left pondering: what happens next for these devices?

  • Dependability Concerns: Users express discontent regarding the need for devices to remain plugged in.

  • Distrust in Brands: Several are considering alternatives, showcasing growing distrust in legacy options.

  • Proactive Measures: Users are moving toward backup strategies to minimize losses.

Key Points to Note

  • โ–ณ Many users face similar issues with devices failing to power on.

  • โ–ผ Some recommend alternatives, emphasizing a search for reliability.

  • โœ“ "If I can plug in, open the app, and update, Iโ€™m fine," one user remarked, seeking viable workarounds.

What Lies Ahead for Crypto Hardware?

As complaints accumulate, the future of these devices may be at a crossroads. Will manufacturers address the ongoing battery problems? Many speculate potential firmware updates or redesigns could be on the horizon, aiming for improved device stability. However, thereโ€™s concern that the focus could shift towards new releases, sidelining solutions for existing issues. This ongoing frustration hints at a growing movement toward battery-free hardware, demonstrating a clear demand for reliability in the crypto sector.

Reflecting on Past Challenges

This scenario echoes the early smartphone days when battery drain issues were common. Frustration in those times spurred innovation, ultimately pushing brands to address battery technology. As user dissatisfaction mounts, will this drive necessary changes in the crypto hardware market? Only time will tell.