Home
/
Industry news
/
Regulatory updates
/

Tax trouble for bridging eth: gains without selling

Friend Bridges โ‚น2.9 L of ETH to L2 | Tax Office Claims โ‚น1.2 L Owed

By

Nicolas Dubois

Jun 5, 2025, 11:41 AM

Edited By

David Chen

2 minutes needed to read

Person looking worried while reviewing tax documents related to ETH transfer to Layer 2 chain
popular

A recent email from Indiaโ€™s Income-tax Department has sparked outrage among crypto enthusiasts. A user who transferred โ‚น2,90,000 worth of ETH to a Layer 2 platform to cut costs now faces a โ‚น1,18,400 tax bill due to assumed capital gains.

Taxation Controversy

In June 2025, a crypto user moved their assets from the mainnet to Base, hoping to avoid hefty transaction fees. After rekindling interest with a modest income from rebate tokens, the user was startled to receive a tax notice last Friday claiming they underreported a capital gain of โ‚น1,98,000. Now, they must deal with penalties and interest for what the tax office considers a taxable event.

โ€œProvide cost-basis documentation and KYC of the counter-party,โ€ read the tax departmentโ€™s response.

However, this raises questions about the interpretation of tax laws regarding decentralized finance (DeFi). Tax authorities are treating this transfer as a full sale and subsequent buy, which many find unjust.

Experiences of Others

Reports are pouring in from forums such as r/CryptoTax and r/IndiaInvest, where users echo similar frustrations. One individual shared that after moving ETH to Arbitrum and back, their records inaccurately indicated โ‚น8 L in profitsโ€”despite no actual profit being realized.

Common Sentiments

  • Many find the tax interpretation flawed, saying it needs to be challenged legally.

  • Experiences from abroad reveal differing regulations where internal transfers could also trigger taxation.

  • Frustration is prevalent, with comments highlighting the hurdles of accurately tracking transactions in the digital asset landscape.

Key Insights

  • โš–๏ธ 60% penalty typically applied on misreported crypto transactions.

  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Other users are facing similar uncertainties with their tax returns.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ โ€œThis sets a dangerous precedent,โ€ commented one observer.

As the crypto community grapples with this issue, potential challenges may arise for Indiaโ€™s regulatory approach to digital currencies. Will users push back on these regulations, or will they adapt to this taxing landscape? This ongoing story is likely to develop as more individuals confront similar tax dilemmas in 2025.

Predictions for the Crypto Tax Landscape

As the situation evolves, there's a strong chance that the crypto community will rally to challenge these tax interpretations in court. Analysts estimate that around 70% of those recently contacted by tax authorities may join legal efforts, aiming to push back against what they see as punitive regulations. Additionally, as more individuals recognize the tax implications of digital asset transfers, thereโ€™s likely to be an increase in demand for clear, user-friendly tax guides specific to cryptocurrenciesโ€”potentially prompting the Indian government to reconsider its tax approach. Other countries are watching closely, and if successful legal challenges emerge, we might see a ripple effect in tax policy adjustments across the globe.

A Lesson from Yesteryears

This controversy mirrors the early days of the internet when traditional regulations struggled to keep pace with technological innovations. Much like how online businesses faced an uphill battle against outdated sales tax laws, the crypto community is now in a similar fight against misunderstood and antiquated taxation systems. Just as online entrepreneurs banded together to advocate for fair treatment, todayโ€™s crypto enthusiasts may find strength in unity, striving to reshape the regulatory landscape for future generations in a way that promotes innovation rather than stifling it.