Home
/
Educational resources
/
Mining and staking
/

Why staking sol on exchanges hurts your potential gains

Say Goodbye to Staking SOL on Exchanges | Users Push for Self-Custody Benefits

By

Haruto Saito

Jul 2, 2025, 02:40 PM

Edited By

David Green

Updated

Jul 3, 2025, 01:34 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A person looking frustrated while checking low staking rewards on a smartphone, with a decline graph in the background.
popular

A growing coalition of crypto enthusiasts is rallying against staking Solana (SOL) on exchanges, claiming it leads to suppressed prices and missed rewards. Amid ongoing discussions, many point to scams and the challenges of self-custody, raising concerns about user security and asset management.

The Conversation Heats Up

Recent comments show that not everyone is keen on staking through exchanges. One user highlighted an alternative, stating, "I run a sniper bot with it. The ROI is 400-500% compared to 7% APY, lol." This perspective emphasizes the appeal of automated trading strategies over standard staking methods.

Some users are looking to platforms with better returns; another chimed in, "I would swap to JupSOL, ezee pzee! Swap and chill. 9% apy." The quest for effective staking and trading options is more urgent than ever, especially among beginners seeking trusted platforms to avoid potential pitfalls.

Convenience vs. Complexity

While many wrestle with the learning curve of self-custody, others express mixed feelings about the ease of exchanges. One user said, "I personally just keep it on exchange everything in crypto is a risk. I stake on exchange for convenience." This highlights a prevailing attitude where convenience might outweigh security concerns.

Responses regarding trust in exchanges vary:

"Too many horror stories over the years of off exchange theft."

This sentiment underlines the anxiety that still surrounds non-exchange staking.

Key Themes Emerging from User Perspectives

  1. High Returns vs. Low Risk: Users are exploring alternatives like sniper bots or different platforms for higher returns.

  2. Self-Custody Hesitations: Many express anxiety about managing wallets independently and the risks of making mistakes during transactions.

  3. Trust Issues with Exchanges: Some people argue that while exchanges have risks, the immediate access to funds and support makes them a necessary evil.

Key Takeaways

  • πŸ”₯ "The ROI is 400-500%" – some users prefer automated trading over traditional staking.

  • βš–οΈ Many stick with exchanges for their accessibility, citing trade-offs in security.

  • πŸš€ Awareness around self-custody is growing, yet the anxiety surrounding it keeps many tethered to exchanges.

As discussions continue, the balance between seeking higher returns versus managing risk demonstrates a pivotal moment in how people consider their SOL. Could this trend spark a broader shift in staking behavior as the crypto market evolves?

Looking Ahead

Experts suggest that as more people become educated about self-custody, up to 60% may start using hardware wallets in the next year. With persistent media coverage of hacks, many will seek new ways to protect their assets, potentially turning to more secure options, despite the learning hurdles.

The current discourse reflects a significant moment of change, paralleling historical trends where individuals prioritize safety and control over perceived convenience. As adoption grows, it might reshape how SOL holders navigate their options.