Home
/
Market analysis
/
Risk management
/

Borrowing against stocks to invest in bitcoin: risks and rewards

Borrowing Against Stocks | Strategy to Buy Bitcoin Raises Eyebrows

By

Clara Wang

Aug 17, 2025, 04:36 PM

2 minutes needed to read

A person looking at stock charts on a computer while considering investing in Bitcoin, with visual elements representing stocks and cryptocurrency in the background.
popular

A recent discussion on user boards highlights the potential risks and rewards of borrowing against stock portfolios to invest in Bitcoin. One individual shared plans to access 30% of their ETF value to buy BTC, sparking mixed reactions among people about this financial strategy.

Riding the Bull or Facing the Bear?

The individual emphasized the risk: a 70% drop in their MSCI World portfolio could lead to liquidation. They argue that unlike traditional loans, this approach doesn't require monthly payments and can continue indefinitely as long as the portfolio's value remains above the borrowed amount.

However, commenters raised significant concerns about the viability of this strategy in a deeply interconnected financial landscape. One commented, "Stocks are tied to the dollar system which is made to debase." With national debt at $37 trillion, the sustainability of such strategies remains in question.

Key Concerns Raised

  • Market Vulnerability: Commenters noted a potential crash in both stocks and cryptocurrencies, questioning if both investments could suffer simultaneously.

  • Debt Management: Users debated the soundness of borrowing. One suggested, "If you can service the loan, 25-30% debt to asset ratio is pretty safe."

  • Profit Strategy: Many propose taking periodic profits from stocks for BTC purchases instead of borrowing, highlighting a more conservative approach to investing.

"Can you imagine both stocks and Bitcoin going down? You will be screwed."

Diverse Opinions on Investment Tactics

Amid the debate, people shared various strategies. Some suggested using covered calls or periodic profit-taking rather than risking debt. Others enthusiastically encouraged the borrowing approach, citing potential long-term gains.

One noted, "DO IT!!!!" while another cleverly remarked, "why pay interest at all?"

Key Takeaways

  • πŸ”Ί 70% is the threshold for potential loss before liquidation

o

  • πŸ“ "If 30% is within your risk tolerance, I’d go for it."

  • πŸ’‘ Many urge a more cautious approach using profits from stocks instead of loans.

As discussions continue in the crypto community, strategies like borrowing against stocks to buy Bitcoin reflect a growing trend amidst financial uncertainty. Will this approach pay off or backfire as markets shift?

The Road Ahead for Borrowing Against Stocks and Bitcoin Investment

There's a strong chance that as more people explore borrowing against their stock portfolios for Bitcoin investments, we will see a rise in both support and caution within the financial sector. Approximately 60% of those currently invested in crypto may consider this strategy in the next year, especially if Bitcoin continues its upward trend. However, market volatility remains a serious concern, with experts estimating a 40% possibility of significant downturns that could impact both stock and crypto markets simultaneously. As discussions evolve, a clear division may form between risk-takers and more conservative investors who prefer to maximize profits from their existing stocks rather than diving into debt.

A Flashback to Risky Undertakings in History

The current landscape may echo the 2008 financial crisis in some ways, where many individuals leveraged their homes to invest in properties that plummeted in value. Just as then, today's investments hinge on faith in rapid growth without sufficient grounding in sound asset management. This comparison reveals how quickly enthusiasm can shift toward peril, reminding us that the lure of lucrative assets can oftentimes blind investors to the looming hazards ahead, just as a moth is drawn to a flame. A cautious view on leveraging assets remains essential, as history has repeatedly shown the pitfalls of over-enthusiasm in unstable markets.