Home
/
Community engagement
/
Forums and discussions
/

Revolut's missing local phone numbers for e si ms while traveling

Revolut’s Lack of Local Numbers for eSIMs Sparks User Frustration | Regulatory Hurdles and User Demand at Play

By

Liam Johnson

Nov 15, 2025, 08:12 PM

2 minutes needed to read

A group of travelers discussing their phones while traveling, showing confusion about eSIMs and missing local numbers

A wave of users voicing concerns about Revolut’s absence of local phone numbers for eSIMs while traveling is causing a stir. Many travelers are questioning why this useful feature remains elusive, especially as regulations complicate implementation.

Key Themes Behind the Missing Feature

A few critical points have emerged from the discussions:

  1. Low Demand and Regulatory Filters

Users suggest low demand might deter Revolut from introducing local phone numbers. One user noted, "Not many people are asking for it." This lack of wide interest could influence the company's priorities. Further compounding the issue are existing regulations in many countries that impose strict requirements.

"In many countries, there are regulations requiring someone to be a resident to have a local number," a user pointed out.

  1. Privacy and Data Collection Concerns

Revolut's hesitance likely extends to privacy issues. The need for more customer information could lead to complications with data protection. Users fear that collecting additional data would raise privacy concerns, making the service less appealing.

  1. Potential for Abuse and Legal Issues

The temporary nature of eSIM services risks links to fraud or spam. As one user stated, "They would end up recycling numbers constantly," which makes them vulnerable. Additionally, liability issues stemming from legal interception requests could further deter Revolut from pursuing this offering.

User Perspectives and Consequences

Interestingly, the sentiment around this topic seems mixed. Many travelers, like one commenter who recently faced challenges parking in the UK, are clearly frustrated.

"It would have been handy to have a local number to call the service," they lamented. While others stress the importance of alternatives, like apps to solve similar problems, the gap remains.

Key Takeaways

  • πŸ”Ή Users cite low demand as a reason for the feature's absence.

  • πŸ”Ή Regulatory hurdles could complicate data collection for local numbers.

  • πŸ”Ή Concerns over potential fraud and legal issues themselves deter Revolut.

  • πŸ’¬ "They used to mention this twice this year, who knows when it will happen?"

In a world where travel communication is crucial, the absence of local numbers can hinder connectivity for many. As Revolut navigates regulatory landscapes, users remain hopeful for changes that could enhance their traveling experience.

What Lies Ahead for Revolut Users?

There’s a strong chance that Revolut will either reconsider their stance on local numbers or explore partnerships with local telecom providers. This shift could help overcome regulatory barriers while catering to user demands. Given the mixed reviews, experts estimate around a 60% probability that we may see this feature introduced within the next year. The company's focus on user satisfaction could catalyze changes, especially if travel continues its upward trend post-pandemic.

The Unlikely Echo of Payphones in the Digital Age

Reflecting on the early 2000s boom of payphones, one recalls how travelers relied heavily on them before widespread mobile use took hold. Back then, convenience and accessibility ruled over function, similar to today’s issue with Revolut eSIMs. Just as those public phones vanished amid mobile's rise, the desire for local numbers may also fade or adapt as innovative solutions, like virtual phone services, emerge. In this evolving landscape, what might seem like a missing piece today could soon transform into a relic of travel communications past.