Edited By
Fatima Al-Mansoori

A wave of users voicing concerns about Revolutβs absence of local phone numbers for eSIMs while traveling is causing a stir. Many travelers are questioning why this useful feature remains elusive, especially as regulations complicate implementation.
A few critical points have emerged from the discussions:
Low Demand and Regulatory Filters
Users suggest low demand might deter Revolut from introducing local phone numbers. One user noted, "Not many people are asking for it." This lack of wide interest could influence the company's priorities. Further compounding the issue are existing regulations in many countries that impose strict requirements.
"In many countries, there are regulations requiring someone to be a resident to have a local number," a user pointed out.
Privacy and Data Collection Concerns
Revolut's hesitance likely extends to privacy issues. The need for more customer information could lead to complications with data protection. Users fear that collecting additional data would raise privacy concerns, making the service less appealing.
Potential for Abuse and Legal Issues
The temporary nature of eSIM services risks links to fraud or spam. As one user stated, "They would end up recycling numbers constantly," which makes them vulnerable. Additionally, liability issues stemming from legal interception requests could further deter Revolut from pursuing this offering.
Interestingly, the sentiment around this topic seems mixed. Many travelers, like one commenter who recently faced challenges parking in the UK, are clearly frustrated.
"It would have been handy to have a local number to call the service," they lamented. While others stress the importance of alternatives, like apps to solve similar problems, the gap remains.
πΉ Users cite low demand as a reason for the feature's absence.
πΉ Regulatory hurdles could complicate data collection for local numbers.
πΉ Concerns over potential fraud and legal issues themselves deter Revolut.
π¬ "They used to mention this twice this year, who knows when it will happen?"
In a world where travel communication is crucial, the absence of local numbers can hinder connectivity for many. As Revolut navigates regulatory landscapes, users remain hopeful for changes that could enhance their traveling experience.
Thereβs a strong chance that Revolut will either reconsider their stance on local numbers or explore partnerships with local telecom providers. This shift could help overcome regulatory barriers while catering to user demands. Given the mixed reviews, experts estimate around a 60% probability that we may see this feature introduced within the next year. The company's focus on user satisfaction could catalyze changes, especially if travel continues its upward trend post-pandemic.
Reflecting on the early 2000s boom of payphones, one recalls how travelers relied heavily on them before widespread mobile use took hold. Back then, convenience and accessibility ruled over function, similar to todayβs issue with Revolut eSIMs. Just as those public phones vanished amid mobile's rise, the desire for local numbers may also fade or adapt as innovative solutions, like virtual phone services, emerge. In this evolving landscape, what might seem like a missing piece today could soon transform into a relic of travel communications past.