A growing coalition of people is pushing back against Qubic's mining authority. Many are now renting hashrate in hopes of reshaping the competitive landscape in crypto mining as discussions intensify about Qubic's market grip.
As of August 2025, the crypto mining community is increasingly focused on collaborative efforts to rent computational power. This strategy aims to drive up costs for Qubic and enhance their chances of survival. Services like MiningRigRentals are gaining traction, with rental periods ranging from 24 hours to two months.
Recent comments have brought additional perspectives:
Earnings vs. Renting: People have questioned why some companies do not mine themselves if it yields more profits compared to renting out equipment.
Mining Questions: Others wonder if rented miners still mine Monero when not in use, raising points about effectiveness and usage.
Three significant points have emerged:
Effectiveness in Question: Comments highlight doubts about whether renting hashrate can genuinely compete with Qubic's scale. One user noted, "Every bit counts, but itβs like a drop in the bucket."
Reliability of Rental Sources: There's skepticism regarding lesser-known platforms, with some describing certain offers as "sketchy" due to unclear hardware details.
Alternatives to Renting: The community is discussing the merits of purchasing mining rigs outright instead of renting. A commentator suggested, "Wouldnβt it make more sense to buy rigs? The rigs are always there to mine."
Opinions among community members show a mix of optimism and skepticism. Positive feedback includes remarks like "Doing Godβs work," with hopes for a way to counter Qubic's extensive hashrate. One member stated, "We've been fortunate with generous customers to allow us to do this. A lasting negative impact from Qubicβs actions would be harmful for all of us."
β³ Small Contributions Matter: Many believe even slight contributions, like 10 kh/s, can impact the market.
β½ Long-Term Viability in Doubt: Concerns about renting often lead to losses, raising doubts about its overall effectiveness.
β» "We can make it too expensive for Qubic to continue," captures a hopeful view from community members.
Interestingly, despite some viewing renting as a potential tactic, others are left wondering if it can effectively challenge Qubic's dominance at nearly 2 GH/s. Can a united community truly make a difference against such a powerful opponent?
Experts suggest that the rental strategy is likely to grow as people continue teaming up. If around 10-15% of miners contribute to pooled hashrate, they could significantly pressure Qubic, slowing its growth. However, doubts remain whether renting will yield enough results compared to Qubicβs power. Observing community reactions is expected to foster further strategies and encourage rental platforms to enhance both transparency and reliability.
Historically, small farmers in the Midwest joined forces in the mid-20th century, pooling resources to compete against large firms. Todayβs crypto community reflects this model, suggesting that pooled hashrate could shift competitive dynamics, much like farmers banding together against bigger adversaries.