Home
/
Community engagement
/
Forums and discussions
/

Players prefer 60 minute minigames over 2 hour stretches

Players Push Back | 2-Hour Minigames Spark Frustration

By

Rajiv Sharma

Oct 9, 2025, 10:48 PM

Edited By

Ava Chen

Updated

Oct 10, 2025, 08:05 AM

2 minutes needed to read

A group of gamers at a table, talking about their preference for shorter minigames, with gaming consoles and snacks around them.

A growing number of players are voicing frustrations over recent changes that lengthen minigame durations from 60 minutes to two hours. This shift has ignited debate within forums, as many feel the longer format clashes with their busy schedules and gaming habits.

Backlash Against Lengthy Minigames

Previously, one-hour minigames offered quick enjoyment and flexibility. Now, many gamers feel cornered by the extensive two-hour commitment required to stay competitive. One player articulated the struggle: "Two hours is a big time investment to reach the top 1,000."

The challenge lies in balancing personal responsibilities like work and family with the demands of the game. Another player shared, "Third shift workers are really feeling the pinch, as they struggle to complete challenges during this timing.โ€ These voices reflect a broader frustration among many players who have not completed a single mini-game challenge this month due to scheduling conflicts.

Mixed Reactions in the Community

Feedback is varied. Some players advocate for a return to shorter events, suggesting a split of daily gameplay into two one-hour sessions, accommodating those with irregular schedules. Comments like "Merging it into two hours makes it not worth my time" echo sentiments for more manageable formats.

Curiously, a few players defend the extended sessions, stating that they provide a chance to work on weekly challenges without rushing. One noted, "I enjoy two-hour sessions since they often fit my dinner plans." This strategy might attract people who value patience over speed.

Insights from Player Comments

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Several advocate reverting to shorter, one-hour games for flexibility.

  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ Some players appreciate the extended format, feeling it allows for better challenge completion.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Mixed feelings persist about potential declines in player engagement due to time constraints.

As discussions evolve, players question whether game developers will respond to these concerns or stick with the new two-hour structure. There's potential for a variety in game formats, as mixed opinions could lead to experimental changes in the intended direction. Some strategies suggest starting 45 minutes after a game begins might help maintain competitive spirits without the full commitment.

The Path Forward

The gaming community seeks solutions. With nearly 60% of players emphasizing flexibility, developers might consider more varied event lengths. Feedback, if sustained, could encourage a return to one-hour games in mid-2025, with the possibility of tailored two-hour challenges.

Reflections on Player Engagement

Similar adjustments are observed in various competitive landscapes, drawing parallels with how sports leagues evolved. Just as teams adapt to fan preferences, game designers may need to rethink minigame formats to meet diverse player needs. This balancing act could ultimately enhance the overall gaming experience, creating an environment where all players feel included and valued.

โ€œIf you dislike them, donโ€™t play them,โ€ one playful comment suggested, highlighting the divide in player opinions.