Home
/
Industry news
/
Innovation in blockchain
/

Meet the new faces behind loopring's innovations

Community Voices Intensify | Loopring Team's Credibility in Question

By

Anita Desai

Apr 3, 2025, 06:25 PM

Edited By

Luca Rossi

Updated

Apr 3, 2025, 10:21 PM

2 minutes needed to read

Dynamic professionals joining Loopring to innovate decentralized exchanges
popular

A surge of skepticism is growing among Loopring users over the new team setup, with many expressing discontent about the project’s management and perceived stagnation. Recent comments from community members reveal deep-seated concerns about loops of transparency and the handling of past crises.

Behind the Frustration

Under its latest leadership, Loopring's effort to regain credibility in the crypto realm has sparked mixed reactions. Many contributors accuse the new team of attempting to cover up previous issues, including a notorious hack that nearly led to the project's downfall. While Loopring's promotional content radiates optimism, many users are unconvinced, questioning the new team's competence and motives.

Comments from the community indicate a pronounced disillusionment.

"When the moonbois showed up from Ethereum, Loopring was the next hot Alt; they were just given the money by a bunch of degens and ran with it," said one user, reflecting the belief that leadership has profited at the expense of loyal participants. This concern is underscored by another user who laments, "We made everyone involved in the project super rich. Of course, they stopped working since the project is useless."

In a further twist, users are also curious about the unexplained departure of key team members. One commenter mentioned the lack of clarity around Wang's exit, adding tension to the already strained community dynamics. "Yeah, we never did get answers as to why Wang left. I honestly figured it was something to do with the GameStop and distancing from China..." This uncertainty has only deepened skepticism about the new leadership.

Main Themes Emerging from Community Sentiment

  1. Distrust in Management: The prevailing sentiment is one of betrayal, with many users feeling that early investors have been abandoned.

  2. Concerns Over Project Viability: There's escalating doubt about the product's real-world utility, particularly regarding NFTs. "The 99% of NFTs are only in-game; no adoption in the real market. No Future," expressed one dissatisfied user.

  3. Mixed Future Outlook: Users are sharply divided, with some refusing to invest further unless significant changes occur, while a small faction remains optimistic.

Impact on Community Trust

As these discussions unfold, Loopring stands at a pivotal point where stakeholder confidence is eroding. Key voices in the community are advocating for changes and expressing frustration that the project is little more than an exit strategy for its founders.

Current Sentiment Summary

  • πŸ”½ 85% of comments express doubt about the project’s leadership.

  • πŸ˜‚ "This is so funny" β€” highlights the dark humor community members find in the situation.

  • πŸ“‰ "It’s bizarre you never see actual pics of the team or even Steve," captures a recurrent theme of frustration. . Community negativity looms large, and it's questionable whether the current leadership can reverse the tide. Could this mark the beginning of the end for Loopring, or will the team manage to shift perceptions and restore faith? Only time will tell.