Edited By
Sofia Petrov

A surge of ideas for earning AB in the community has ignited discussions, with suggestions ranging from weekly challenges to engaging with ads. Some users are skeptical, questioning the feasibility and implications of these initiatives.
Players have proposed various methods to enhance the earning potential of AB, including:
Weekly Claims: Earn up to 10 AB as a reward for claiming like diamonds on the Map.
Territory Wars: Compete against towns of similar sizes, where the town that purchases the most land parcels within a week takes the win. A minimum purchase ensures even small investors can earn rewards.
Daily Polls: Participate without ads and receive 1 AB for answering questions, with the potential for data sale.
Walking Challenges: Some have suggested earning AB for physical activities like walking 10 km, similar to existing fitness apps.
While some users embraced these suggestions, others expressed concerns over their impact on the gameβs economic balance. One user noted, "This is essentially giving away 10 AB per week for free, without getting anything in return."
Another pointed out the need for the ads to sustain any new initiatives: "The daily login bonus is funded with Explorer's Club memberships So is the minigames and their newest Atlas Games video."
"The whales come through all the time to buy land, so that will ruin whatever the intent was behind land competitions," shared a concerned participant.
Three primary themes surfaced in the comments:
Economic Feasibility: The idea of freely distributing AB points raises concernsβit could cost the company significantly if implemented.
Competition Dynamics: Engagement methods like Territory Wars might unintentionally favor more affluent players, skewing the competition.
Community Engagement: Suggestions to reward participation in forums exacerbate the necessity for data collection, making rewards meaningful.
The assortment of ideas has struck a chord within the community, encouraging a blend of creativity and skepticism. As these discussions brew, what will ultimately be implemented remains to be seen in the evolving landscape of AB earning methods. Will the proposed rewards invigorate participation or deter engagement entirely?
πΉ Players propose multiple new earning strategies for AB.
πΈ Mixed sentiments dominate community reactions regarding sustainability.
β οΈ Major concerns regarding potential economic implications for the game.
As discussions around new methods for earning AB continue, the gameβs developers may consider implementing one or more of these strategies. There's a strong chance that a modified approach to Territory Wars will be introduced, as this could potentially boost user engagement while balancing economic concerns. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that the developers will integrate community feedback into their upcoming patches, ultimately creating a more refined experience. Meanwhile, the popularity of walking challenges might drive the incorporation of health-related initiatives, enhancing participation with an estimated 50% likelihood. Overall, how these concepts shape the gameβs future depends not only on community support but also on their financial sustainability in the long run.
This situation echoes the early days of social media platforms where users had high hopes for creative engagement methods like daily check-ins and contests. For instance, consider Facebook's early use of FarmVille-like games that rewarded users for interacting with friends and engaging in erudite social competition. Those innovations not only drew users in but also led to economic shifts in how these platforms monetized engagement. In many ways, the evolution of AB earning methods mirrors this trajectory, where adaptability will be crucial to thriving in a competitive environment, much like how early social connectivity reshaped online interactions far beyond simple likes.