Home
/
Industry news
/
Bitcoin and ethereum news
/

China accuses u.s. in massive $13 billion bitcoin theft

China | Blames U.S. | $13 Billion Bitcoin Heist

By

Hassan Al-Sayed

Nov 18, 2025, 04:21 AM

2 minutes needed to read

China's flag and the U.S. flag with a Bitcoin symbol in the center, representing the accusation of theft.
popular

Controversy Brews Over Allegations

China has recently accused the United States of orchestrating a massive heist involving over $13 billion worth of Bitcoin. The theft, which took place in December 2020, involved 127,272 Bitcoin tokens stolen from the LuBian Bitcoin mining pool. This event ranks among the largest cryptocurrency heists in history and has sparked outrage across various forums.

Context and Significance

The accusations come amid ongoing tensions between the two nations over technology and security issues. Chinese sources assert that the theft is emblematic of a broader issue: state-sponsored hacking. They claim that the U.S. has a history of ignoring international law when it comes to seizing assets, with one commenter stating, "It is what it is: theft."

Emerging Themes from Discussion

  1. Lack of Trust in Bitcoin: Many argue that incidents like this highlight vulnerabilities in cryptocurrencies. As one user aptly put it, "If it is so easy to steal an asset that is supposed to be a store of value, does its price reflect that value?"

  2. Accusations of Hacking: Some suggest that the U.S. government employed advanced hacking methods as early as 2020 to carry out this theft. The skepticism over the event's coverage adds a layer of intrigue.

  3. China’s Stance on Digital Currency: Despite its ban on Bitcoin, some commenters pointed out that China is actively developing its digital currency, raising questions about the country’s stance and future in the crypto realm.

"China will never adopt Bitcoin," remarked one commenter, highlighting a prevailing distrust of the cryptocurrency following the scandal.

Sentiment and Reactions

Mixed sentiments emerge from the comments, with many expressing skepticism toward the viability of Bitcoin as a store of value. One comment suggested that the U.S. has a penchant for acting unilaterally, raising concerns about a potentially dystopian financial future.

Key Insights

  • 🚨 China’s claims reflect a rising skepticism of Bitcoin’s reliability.

  • πŸ” Accusations against the U.S. point to concerns over jurisdiction and state-sponsored actions.

  • 🧐 The future of digital currency remains uncertain amid ongoing criticisms and developments.

As the debate unfolds, will trust in Bitcoin diminish further, or can it rebound from these significant allegations? Time will tell.

What Lies Ahead for Bitcoin and U.S.-China Relations

There’s a strong chance that the accusations from China could lead to tighter regulations in the cryptocurrency space, as governments grapple with security concerns and international relations. Experts estimate around a 60% likelihood that both nations will increase scrutiny on digital currencies, potentially affecting Bitcoin’s value. Additionally, if the U.S. government is found to be involved in hacking for cryptocurrency, it could trigger a significant backlash, leading to sanctions or retaliatory measures against American tech firms. Expect debates around cryptocurrency regulation to intensify, altering the trust landscape that many perceive towards Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

A Historical Echo from the Digital Age

Looking back at the infamous Sony Pictures hack in 2014, which saw leaked emails and data thanks to alleged state-sponsored actors, we can draw a parallel to the current Bitcoin heist claims. In that instance, international relations soured as fingers were pointed, and confidence in digital security dwindled. Just as that event reshaped policy around cybersecurity, this latest accusation could provoke profound shifts in how countries approach digital currencies, reshaping the future financial landscape for years to come. If history serves as a guide, the fallout from these allegations may spark innovation in security and a rethinking of trust in digital assets.