A rising wave of frustration among Australians is spotlighting stringent bank restrictions on crypto transactions and cash withdrawals in 2025. Incidents of delays, caps, and outright rejections are hampering many people's financial plans as banks tighten their grip.
In September 2025, banks in Australia face scrutiny under the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006, closely monitored by AUSTRAC. This has led major institutions like CBA, ANZ, Westpac, and NAB to impose strict measures on high-risk transactions, particularly those related to cryptocurrency.
"Many banks deny crypto transfers while letting large gambling withdrawals slide," one affected person declared.
Crypto Transfers: Common restrictions include 24-hour transaction holds, monthly limits around $10,000, and frequent outright rejections. Both CBA and ANZ are noted for maintaining these rules, even when dealing with customers who have clean transaction histories.
Cash Withdrawals: Transactions exceeding $10,000 typically require verifiable reasons, leading to frequent delays and denials.
Interestingly, smaller banks such as UBank and ING appear to be more accommodating, processing transactions without extensive delays.
People on forums express growing discontent over these banking practices. A user shared, "This is a REALLY bad idea. Persistent complaints is a good way to get your accounts closed. If you canβt find a bank that offers what you want, maybe there is a reason?" In contrast, another stated, "I send from CBA to Suncorp and do my business there," suggesting some individuals have turned to alternative solutions outside major banks.
To regain control, affected people have several options:
File a Complaint with Your Bank
Always document the issue and its impact on financial plans.
Banks such as CBA, ANZ, Westpac, and NAB have dedicated complaint numbers:
CBA: 13 22 21
ANZ: 13 13 14
Westpac: 132 032
NAB: 13 22 65
Escalate to AFCA
If the response is unsatisfactory, escalate to the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, which handles complaints against banks free of charge.
Ensure complaints are filed within the prescribed timelinesβtwo years for incidents or six years for ongoing issues.
Seek Alternatives
Switching to smaller banks can yield better experiences. Users report increased satisfaction when using institutions like UBank and ING.
π Many banks contribute to the growing frustration with strict protocols.
π« Users feeling powerless often highlight discrepancies in treatment, particularly concerning gambling withdrawals compared to crypto transfers.
π° AFCA's data shows high compensation potential for justified complaints, underscoring a significant opportunity for consumers.
Interestingly, this situation poses a question: Are banks prioritizing security over customersβ needs? As sentiments swing towards reform, could this bring about meaningful change in the banking sector?
Given that 70% of those involved express dissatisfaction, experts believe a significant percentage may seek alternate banking solutions by the close of 2025. As frustration mounts, banks may have to revise their policies to survive competition, especially surrounding transparency and customer service. Could user rights and better treatment be the future of banking in Australia?