Home
/
Market analysis
/
Market cap insights
/

Exploring the absence of bch et fs compared to ltc

LTC Thrives with ETFs | What's Stopping BCH?

By

Maya Thompson

Apr 9, 2025, 09:16 PM

Edited By

Ali Khan

Updated

Apr 14, 2025, 08:20 PM

2 minutes needed to read

Visual representation highlighting the differences between Bitcoin Cash and Litecoin ETFs
popular

A growing coalition of users is questioning the apparent absence of a Bitcoin Cash (BCH) ETF, particularly as Litecoin (LTC) has already made strides by securing its own. The crypto community is abuzz with concerns, debating whether BCH could hold its ground against LTC in market cap and why there have been no filings yet.

The Current ETF Situation

In recent months, the crypto market has witnessed significant developments with ETFs emerging as a popular investment avenue. However, the striking lack of a BCH ETF sparks speculation and confusion. While some point to regulatory hurdles as a main concern, others suspect different motives may be behind the delay.

Interestingly, sources indicate that BCH’s rarityβ€”stemming from a considerable number of its coins being lost after a forkβ€”could be a contributing factor to its unavailability in ETF form. "BCH is rarer than LTC because its chain is older," one user noted, implying that a potential BCH ETF might be waiting until institutions accumulate enough of the currency to maximize profits. With many whales reportedly primed and ready, the potential for a BCH ETF seems to be on the horizon.

Themes Emerging From the Conversation

As discussions evolve, a few key themes emerge:

  • Industry Dynamics: Users express skepticism regarding whether BCH's perceived lower demand reflects its marketability or if other external forces are suppressing its growth.

  • Motivations Behind Delays: Speculation grows around whether profit motives are hindering BCH ETF approvals, with suggestions that some fund managers benefit from keeping BCH off the market.

  • Regulatory Challenges: Confusion lingers as to why BCH's path seems more complicated than LTC’s, with the community seeking clearer answers.

Perspectives Worth Noting

"They are purposely delaying filing for BCH ETFs," pointed out one commentator, emphasizing concerns around the lack of transparency in the decision-making process.

Another voice chimed in, saying, "They are abusing the shareholders for their gain, rather than acting in their interest."

These quotes underline a broader sentiment of distrust lingering among BCH supporters.

Community Impact

As of April 2025, the crypto landscape continues to grapple with the fallout from BCH’s non-ETF status. The ongoing discourse raises pivotal questions regarding investor access and the competitive landscape against established players like LTC. The mixed community sentiments highlight an eager anticipation for an announcement that could alter BCH's trajectory.

Key Points to Consider

  • πŸ” Market Parity: BCH and LTC are neck and neckβ€”why isn’t there an equal representation with ETFs?

  • πŸ’° Motivations in Focus: Delays in BCH ETF filings might be tied to financial incentives related to existing funds.

  • ⏳ Community Action: Persistent calls for transparency and fairness in crypto investing are echoing louder.

The conversation continues, with stakeholders anxiously awaiting decisions that could finally push BCH into the spotlight alongside ETFs. For ongoing discussions and insights regarding cryptocurrency regulations, be sure to check out SEC.gov and Investopedia.