Edited By
Michael Chen
A recent surge of support highlights Base, the Layer 2 network backed by Coinbase, as a leading model for Ethereum scalability. With massive liquidity and a strong user trust, Base is gaining traction as a prime example of how L2s can successfully operate and grow.
Launched last year, Base has achieved remarkable numbers, boasting a $4.3 billion supply in USDC. This demonstrates the high liquidity flowing through the network. As reported by Vivek Raman, Base generated $124 million in sequencer revenue with a staggering profit margin of 95%. Users are taking notice of this efficiency.
However, not all feedback is positive. One commenter noted, "Iβm a little worried about Base's centralization; it experienced downtime recently." While Base represents a successful model, its centralization is raising eyebrows among some in the crypto community.
Coinbase's holdings further cement Baseβs potential, with the platform managing 136,000 ETH. This bolstered backing leads many to believe that Base could become the standard for L2 networks. A comment echoed this sentiment: "The profit margin is insane; that's likely why we have so many L2s!"
β³ Base supports $4.3 billion in USDC liquidity
β½ 95% profit margin suggests high efficiency
β» "Which lasted only half an hour" - some highlight downtime concerns
As other L2s observe, the message is clear: build a strong economic model and ensure deep on-chain liquidity while maintaining security and decentralization. The success of Base not only benefits Coinbase but potentially sets new standards for future networks.
With the rapid development of the crypto space, can Base retain its position as Ethereum's leading Layer 2 solution as more players enter the game? Only time will tell.
Looking ahead, thereβs a strong chance that Base will solidify its position as Ethereumβs go-to Layer 2 solution, especially if it continues to focus on liquidity and profitability. Experts estimate about a 70% probability that other L2 networks will try to mimic Baseβs economic model within the next year. This could lead to a spike in competition and potentially drive innovation in the sector. However, Base must also address its centralization concerns to maintain trust among people. If it fails to do so, thereβs roughly a 40% chance that newer, decentralized players could disrupt its market share in the coming months.
In the mid-2000s, the rise of Facebook transformed social interaction online, much like Base is doing for Ethereum now. Just as Facebook attracted millions by offering an efficient user experience while also grappling with early centralization criticisms, Base may face a similar challenge. The early buzz and growth of the social media giant focused on user engagement and profit, only later sparking debates over privacy and control. Will Base navigate these waters more deftly, learning lessons from Facebookβs journey, or will it fall into the same traps? Much like the evolution of social platforms, the path for Base may not just be about technology but also about trust and user perceptions.